NONE DARE CALL IT "TREASON"
BUT "I DO AND WILL"
CONGRESS BEWARE
noun
noun: treason;noun: high treason;plural noun: high treasons
1.
the crime of betraying one's country, esp. by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
"they were convicted of treason"
synonyms:treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness; sedition, subversion, mutiny, rebellion; high treason, lèse-majesté; apostasy; literaryperfidy
"the treason of Benedict Arnold will be recounted for centuries"
antonyms:allegiance, loyalty
the action of betraying someone or something.
plural noun: treasons
"doubt is the ultimate treason against faith"
synonyms:treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness; More
antonyms:allegiance, loyalty

WHAT IS TREASON?
Treason Defined
TREASON

Under Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution, any person who levies war against the United States or adheres to its enemies by giving them Aid and Comfort has committed treason within the meaning of the Constitution. The term aid and comfort refers to any act that manifests a betrayal of allegiance to the United States, such as furnishing enemies with arms, troops, transportation, shelter, or classified information. If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort has been given.
EXTORTION

Extortion by Public Officers

The essence of extortion by a public officer is the oppressive use of official position to obtain a fee. The officer falsely claims authority to take that to which he or she is not lawfully entitled. This is known as acting under color of office. For example, a highway department officer who collects money from a tax delinquent automobile owner in excess of the authorized amount on the pretense of collecting a fine is extorting money under color of office. The victim, although consenting to payment, is not doing so voluntarily but is yielding to official authority.

There are four basic ways in which a public officer commits extortion. The officer might demand a fee not allowed by law and accept it under the guise of performing an official duty. He or she might take a fee greater than that allowed by law. In this case the victim must at least believe that he or she is under an obligation to pay some amount. A third method is for the officer to receive a fee before it is due. The crime is committed regardless of whether the sum taken is likely to become due in the future. It is not criminal, however, for an officer to collect a fee before it is due if the person paying so requests. Finally, extortion may be committed by the officer's taking a fee for services that are not performed. The service refrained from must be one within the official capacity of the officer in order to constitute extortion.
CONSPIRACY

An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act, or an act that is innocent in itself but becomes unlawful when done by the combination of actors.

Conspiracy is governed by statute in federal courts and most state courts. Before its Codification in state and federal statutes, the crime of conspiracy was simply an agreement to engage in an unlawful act with the intent to carry out the act. Federal statutes, and many state statutes, now require not only agreement and intent but also the commission of an Overt Act in furtherance of the agreement.

Conspiracy is a crime separate from the criminal act for which it is developed. For example, one who conspires with another to commit Burglary and in fact commits the burglary can be charged with both conspiracy to commit burglary and burglary.

Conspiracy is an inchoate, or preparatory, crime. It is similar to solicitation in that both crimes are committed by manifesting an intent to engage in a criminal act. It differs from solicitation in that conspiracy requires an agreement between two or more persons, whereas solicitation can be committed by one person alone.

Conspiracy also resembles attempt. However, attempt, like solicitation, can be committed by a single person. On another level, conspiracy requires less than attempt. A conspiracy may exist before a crime is actually attempted, whereas no attempt charge will succeed unless the requisite attempt is made.

The law seeks to punish conspiracy as a substantive crime separate from the intended crime because when two or more persons agree to commit a crime, the potential for criminal activity increases, and as a result, the danger to the public increases. Therefore, the very act of an agreement with criminal intent (along with an overt act, where required) is considered sufficiently dangerous to warrant charging conspiracy as an offense separate from the intended crime.

According to some criminal-law experts, the concept of conspiracy is too elastic, and the allegation of conspiracy is used by prosecutors as a superfluous criminal charge. Many criminal defense lawyers maintain that conspiracy is often expanded beyond reasonable interpretations. In any case, prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys alike agree that conspiracy cases are usually amorphous and complex.

NONE DARE CALL IT "TREASON" - BUT "I DO AND WILL"
* * * * *
September 21, 2013
An article by: Dr. William Paul Bennett, Jr. PhD
2812 NW Monterey Place. Corvallis, Oregon 97330-3436
Telephone: 1-541-754-6918

* * * * *
VOICING MY PROTEST
* * * * *
Before I begin I want to clearly state "THIS ARTICLE IS MY OWN PERSONAL OPINION IT IS INTENDED TO BE A WAKE UP TO EVERYONE AND YOU HAVE MY AUTHORITY TO PASS IT ON TO ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS AND EMAIL LISTS.  YOU CAN POST IT ON YOUR TWEET OR FACEBOOK PAGES.  IT IS DESIGNED TO ASK YOU TO HELP SPREAD THE WORD.  IT IS INTENDED TO OFFEND BOTH HOUSES OF CONGRESS AND PARTICULARLY THE SO CALLED "REPUBLICAN TEA PARTY" (which I personally consider a terrorist organization or flat out traders to our country after statements in interviews Friday September 20th 2013 that "THEY ALONE WILL CONTROL OUR NATION").  I want to also make it positively clear the address and telephone number shown above are both my personal residence and my home office phone number.  The number is answered 24/7 by either myself or my answering machine.  If this article should offend you and you take umbrage which causes you to call me, have the courage to leave your phone number and mailing address for responses.  Be advised all calls will be recorded, and threatening calls will be referred to the Attorney's General of both the United States and the State of Oregon.  I usually receive several calls both of praise and of threats by disgruntled readers.  To learn about me and my background you only need to click the link on this site "About Bill Bennett" or enter { http://www.toomuch-bs.com/about-bill-bennett.html }in your search bar.  
* * * * *
The above paragraph and personal information of the author (yours truly) is the opening of an article I posted on September 21, 2013 (8 days ago), and now the unheard of is about to take place.  It is my personal opinion (which I have emailed to all media, the congress, both houses, the leaders of both houses, the President and finally the Attorney General of the United States) "Congress has committed the following crimes; (1) Extortion, (2) Conspiracy to commit treason and finally (3) TREASON!

In my direct email to the Attorney General of the United States, as a by birth citizen of the United States, I charged him to take into custody all members of house of representatives and the senate those who declare themselves to be members of the so called "Republican Tea-Party".  Specifically those who's intent it is to shut down the United States Government at the stroke of Midnight October 1st 2013.  

The specific charges are those previously stated in paragraph one.  I stated that; "AS A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I AM EXERCISING MY RIGHT AND AUTHORITY UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES TO MAKE A CITIZENS ARREST, OF ALL MEMBERS OF THE SO CALLED "REPUBLICAN TEA PARTY" IMMEDIATELY AND EXACTLY AT THE SAME TIME AS THEY DECLARE THE THE GOVERMENT IS SHUT DOWN AND UPON THEIR EXIT FROM THE BUILDING COMMONLY CALLED THE CAPITOL OF THE UNITED STATES. 

I charge him further to take my prisoners into his custody, and detain them until they can be brought before a Federal Judge.  I further charge their bail be set the same as any other citizen of the United States that were arrested for similar charges and no release be allowed until such bail be posted.

If you agree with this action, I then charge you as Citizens of The United States to copy this article and send it immediately to your state Senators and Congressmen/women.  Their email address are listed on the internet.  Send the email to both their in state office as well as their email addresses in Washington D.C.

An article, posting and emailings by

William P. Bennett, Jr. PhD
Monday September 30, 2013 - 11:30AM PST

CITIZENS ARREST

In certain situations, private individuals have the power to make an arrest without a warrant. These types of arrests, known as citizens arrests, occur when ordinary people either detain criminals themselves or direct police officers to detain a criminal.

Citizens arrests are subject to fewer constitutional requirements than an arrest by law enforcement officers, but citizens arrests still have rules that govern them. Failure to abide by these rules can result in civil and criminal liability for the arresting individual.

Felonies

A person can arrest someone that they reasonably suspect of committing a felony, even if the felony didnt occur in the presence of the individual making the arrest. As long as a felony was actually committed and the individual making the arrest knew of the crime, a reasonable suspicion about the identity of the perpetrator will justify their arrest.

The felony must have actually occurred before an individual can make a citizens arrest. Even if a person reasonably believes that a felony has occurred, if the crime did not in fact happen, the person making the arrest could become civilly and criminally liable.

- See more at: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/citizen-s-arrest.html#sthash.vaICEyCS.dpuf

* * * * * * * *